The debate on electoral college pros and cons is not new and Electoral College Pros and Cons are very diverse While it gives voice to the smaller states, it can also negate the concept of the popular vote.
How would it feel if someone becomes the President of the USA while losing the popular vote against his opponent? This happened in the US presidential elections of 2016 when Donald Trump got almost 2.8 million fewer votes than Hillary Clinton, yet he managed to win the White House by 74 electoral votes.
This was not the first incident of its type. John Quincy Adams, Rutherford B. Hayes, Benjamin Harrison, and George W Bush also managed to win the presidency despite losing the popular vote. What are the benefits of using the electoral college, and what makes it controversial? All of this requires a detailed analysis of the electoral college pros and cons, which can be studied below.
Electoral college pros and cons
Pros of the Electoral College
A voice to the neglected states and cities
Imagine a system of the popular vote where all the nominees are busy investing their energies in the more populated areas. This can result in the negligence towards the least populated regions and states.
Political parties can be so sure that investing the resources in the concentrated states can win them the election easily. However, this is where the electoral college comes into play.
Now, political parties know very well that if they neglect a specific city or any state, that entity can vote against them, which can ultimately cause them to lose all the votes of the states.
It helps nominees in shaping their campaign
As a matter of fact, there is a clear bifurcation in the states in the USA. Blue states are more likely to be won by the Democrats, and red states are likely to be won by the Republicans.
So, typically, the Democrats will invest their energies campaigning in the blue states to secure the confirmed votes. For instance, since 1992, California has been a blue state, with nearly 43% of the registered voters voting for Democrats and only 23% voting for Republicans. Similarly, New Jersey, New York, Maryland, and Washington are also blue states and are usually considered safe for the Democrats.
On the other hand, a Republican candidate can expect a favorable result from the red states like Idaho, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Utah, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska. It means that candidates can have a rough estimate about their secure electoral votes and direct their campaign energies to the contested states.
The grey side of the Electoral College
Not every vote matters
You must have heard that every vote matter in a democracy. However, this may not be the case in the electoral college. Take the example of California, for instance, having 55 electoral votes. Imagine a party winning 28 votes, and the other party winning 27 votes out of those 55.
Now, with the electoral college in action, all the 55 votes will go to the party winning 28 votes. It means that even those who voted against a specific presidential candidate will be voting for the nominee of the majority party at the end of the day.
Electoral College- A negation of the popular vote
One of the biggest disadvantages of using the electoral vote is that it negates the popular vote. So, a person can become the President even after getting a lower number of votes in total.
Republican-based Donald Trump is the classic example in this regard, as he lost the popular election by 2.8 million votes, yet he managed to win the White House by a whopping margin of 74 electoral votes. Not only this, but four other Presidents have also won the presidency despite losing the popular vote.
Big states matter most
Why will candidates invest their time and money in the smaller states when they can get the presidency by winning the bigger states? This is the reason why the candidates focus on states like California, New York, Texas, and Florida. Any candidate winning these four states will get 151 votes in total.
On the other hand, a candidate will only get 31 electoral votes if he wins eight states, including North Dakota, South Dakota. Montana, Wyoming, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and West Virginia. So, at the time of the presidential elections, not all the states have an equal voice, which is one of the significant disadvantages of the electoral college.
Will the Electoral College ever be reformed?
Despite its many disadvantages, the electoral college has constitutional significance, and only a constitutional amendment can abolish or reform this system, which seems to be very unlikely in the near future.
Although this system has been criticized severely by political watchdogs, no significant effort has been made in the recent times to promote the popular vote, or to give voice to those whose votes get neglected due to the systematic loopholes. Perhaps a fair balance between the popular vote and the electoral college is the answer to most of the questions which can give voice to the neglected ones.